From: Zooko O'Whielacronx Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:21:14 +0000 (-0700) Subject: merge patch to integrate decentralized directories with patch to handle bad hashes X-Git-Url: https://git.rkrishnan.org/%5B/%5D%20/file/URI:LIT:krugkidfnzsc4/(%5B%5E?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8fee58fcbad0e8829ba4e79233c8729b4a60606a;p=tahoe-lafs%2Ftahoe-lafs.git merge patch to integrate decentralized directories with patch to handle bad hashes --- diff --git a/src/allmydata/mutable.py b/src/allmydata/mutable.py index ba6b68e4..5de4883e 100644 --- a/src/allmydata/mutable.py +++ b/src/allmydata/mutable.py @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ class Publish: # 4a: may need to run recovery algorithm # 5: when enough responses are back, we're done - self.log("starting publish, data is %r" % (newdata,)) + self.log("got enough peers, datalen is %s" % len(newdata)) self._storage_index = self._node.get_storage_index() self._writekey = self._node.get_writekey() @@ -813,8 +813,8 @@ class Publish: def _got_query_results(self, datavs, peerid, permutedid, reachable_peers, current_share_peers): - self.log("_got_query_results") + self.log("_got_query_results from %s" % idlib.shortnodeid_b2a(peerid)) assert isinstance(datavs, dict) reachable_peers[peerid] = permutedid for shnum, datav in datavs.items(): diff --git a/src/allmydata/test/test_system.py b/src/allmydata/test/test_system.py index d404f9ba..2a6bfcfe 100644 --- a/src/allmydata/test/test_system.py +++ b/src/allmydata/test/test_system.py @@ -429,9 +429,69 @@ class SystemTest(testutil.SignalMixin, unittest.TestCase): def _check_download_5(res): log.msg("finished replace2") self.failUnlessEqual(res, NEWERDATA) + d.addCallback(_check_download_5) + + def _corrupt_shares(res): + # run around and flip bits in all but k of the shares, to test + # the hash checks + shares = self._find_shares(self.basedir) + ## sort by share number + #shares.sort( lambda a,b: cmp(a[3], b[3]) ) + where = dict([ (shnum, filename) + for (client_num, storage_index, filename, shnum) + in shares ]) + assert len(where) == 10 # this test is designed for 3-of-10 + for shnum, filename in where.items(): + # shares 7,8,9 are left alone. read will check + # (share_hash_chain, block_hash_tree, share_data). New + # seqnum+R pairs will trigger a check of (seqnum, R, IV, + # segsize, signature). + if shnum == 0: + # read: this will trigger "pubkey doesn't match + # fingerprint". + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "pubkey") + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "encprivkey") + elif shnum == 1: + # triggers "signature is invalid" + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "seqnum") + elif shnum == 2: + # triggers "signature is invalid" + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "R") + elif shnum == 3: + # triggers "signature is invalid" + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "segsize") + elif shnum == 4: + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "share_hash_chain") + elif shnum == 5: + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "block_hash_tree") + elif shnum == 6: + self._corrupt_mutable_share(filename, "share_data") + # other things to correct: IV, signature + # 7,8,9 are left alone + + # note that initial_query_count=5 means that we'll hit the + # first 5 servers in effectively random order (based upon + # response time), so we won't necessarily ever get a "pubkey + # doesn't match fingerprint" error (if we hit shnum>=1 before + # shnum=0, we pull the pubkey from there). To get repeatable + # specific failures, we need to set initial_query_count=1, + # but of course that will change the sequencing behavior of + # the retrieval process. TODO: find a reasonable way to make + # this a parameter, probably when we expand this test to test + # for one failure mode at a time. + + # when we retrieve this, we should get three signature + # failures (where we've mangled seqnum, R, and segsize). The + # pubkey mangling + d.addCallback(_corrupt_shares) + + d.addCallback(lambda res: self._newnode3.download_to_data()) + d.addCallback(_check_download_5) + + def _check_empty_file(res): # make sure we can create empty files, this usually screws up the # segsize math - d1 = self.clients[2].create_mutable_file("") + d1 = self.clients[2].create_mutable_file("", wait_for_numpeers=self.numclients) d1.addCallback(lambda newnode: newnode.download_to_data()) d1.addCallback(lambda res: self.failUnlessEqual("", res)) return d1