From 578a117c5b518c90289bc14e0c9cd4e28d945082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zooko O'Whielacronx <zooko@zooko.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:59:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] test: increase timeout on a network test because Francois's ARM machine hit that timeout I'm skeptical that the test was proceeding correctly but ran out of time. It seems more likely that it had gotten hung. But if we raise the timeout to an even more extravagant number then we can be even more certain that the test was never going to finish. --- src/allmydata/test/test_runner.py | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/allmydata/test/test_runner.py b/src/allmydata/test/test_runner.py index 7990c63a..95309327 100644 --- a/src/allmydata/test/test_runner.py +++ b/src/allmydata/test/test_runner.py @@ -438,7 +438,10 @@ class RunNode(common_util.SignalMixin, unittest.TestCase, pollmixin.PollMixin, return res d.addBoth(_remove_hotline) return d - test_introducer.timeout = 480 # This hit the 120-second timeout on "Francois Lenny-armv5tel", then it hit a 240-second timeout on our feisty2.5 buildslave: http://allmydata.org/buildbot/builders/feisty2.5/builds/2381/steps/test/logs/test.log + test_introducer.timeout = 960 + + # This test hit the 120-second timeout on "Francois Lenny-armv5tel", then it hit a 240-second timeout on our feisty2.5 buildslave: http://allmydata.org/buildbot/builders/feisty2.5/builds/2381/steps/test/logs/test.log + # Then it hit the 480 second timeout on Francois's machine: http://tahoe-lafs.org/buildbot/builders/FranXois%20lenny-armv5tel/builds/449/steps/test/logs/stdio def test_client_no_noise(self): self.skip_if_cannot_daemonize() -- 2.45.2