From 4b6730d361677a72c737f82eb7da1a748580eacd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:32:52 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] solution to 4.16 --- src/sicp/ex4_16.rkt | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/sicp/ex4_16.rkt diff --git a/src/sicp/ex4_16.rkt b/src/sicp/ex4_16.rkt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5a717b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/sicp/ex4_16.rkt @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +#lang racket + +;; a +(define (lookup-variable-value var env) + (define (env-loop env) + (define (scan vars vals) + (cond [(null? vars) + (env-loop (enclosing-environment env))] + [(eq? var (car vars)) + (let ([value (car vals)]) + (if (eq? value '*unassigned*) + (error "evaluating a variable which has not been assigned -- LOOKUP-VARIABLE-VALUE:" value) + value))] + [else (scan (cdr vars) (cdr vals))])) + (if (eq? env the-empty-environment) + (error "unbound variable" var) + (let ([frame (first-frame env)]) + (scan (frame-variables frame) + (frame-values frame))))) + (env-loop env)) + +;; b +(define (tagged-list? expr tag) + (and (pair? expr) (eq? (car expr) tag))) + +(define (definition? expr) + (tagged-list? expr 'define)) + +(define (lambda? expr) + (tagged-list? expr 'lambda)) + +(define (lambda-parameters expr) + (car (cdr expr))) + +(define (make-lambda params body) + (cons 'lambda (cons params body))) + +;;(lambda (x) (..)(..)...(..)) +(define (lambda-body expr) + (cdr (cdr expr))) + +(define (scan-out-defines body) + (define (internal-definition-names defs) + (cond + [(empty? defs) '()] + [else (cons (cadr (car defs)) (internal-definition-names (cdr defs)))])) + (define (internal-definition-values defs) + (cond + [(empty? defs) '()] + [else (cons (caddr (car defs)) (internal-definition-values (cdr defs)))])) + + ;; assumes that definitions come first in the body + (letrec ([get-body-internal (lambda (b) + (cond + [(empty? b) '()] + [(definition? (car b)) (get-body-internal (cdr b))] + [else (cons (car b) + (get-body-internal (cdr b)))]))] + [get-definitions (lambda (b) + (cond + [(empty? b) '()] + [(definition? (car b)) (cons (car b) (get-definitions (cdr b)))] + [else '()]))]) + (let ([internal-definitions (get-definitions body)]) + (let ([def-names (internal-definition-names internal-definitions)] + [def-vals (internal-definition-values internal-definitions)] + [internal-body (get-body-internal body)]) + (letrec ([p (lambda (name-list) + (cond + [(empty? name-list) '()] + [else (cons (list (car name-list) ''*unassigned*) + (p (cdr name-list)))]))] + [s (lambda (names vals) + (cond + [(empty? names) '()] + [else (cons (list 'set! (car names) (car vals)) + (s (cdr names) (cdr vals)))]))]) + (cons 'let + (cons (p def-names) + (append (s def-names def-vals) + internal-body)))))))) + +;; c + +#| +It is better to do this change in the procedure-body so that the procedure abstractions +are maintained as it is. The change we are introducing is related to Scheme and hence +should be done at the lowest level. We should be able to replace procedure-body for another +language and still be able to use the same eval function. + +|# + +(define (procedure-body p) (scan-out-defines (caddr p))) \ No newline at end of file -- 2.37.2