From 8e55957f7dac88fd7ee74658e342d2e3eb9bb50b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daira Hopwood Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 02:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add Summary at the end. Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood --- docs/proposed/magic-folder/remote-to-local-sync.rst | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/proposed/magic-folder/remote-to-local-sync.rst b/docs/proposed/magic-folder/remote-to-local-sync.rst index 2beb31e0..f7176522 100644 --- a/docs/proposed/magic-folder/remote-to-local-sync.rst +++ b/docs/proposed/magic-folder/remote-to-local-sync.rst @@ -864,7 +864,10 @@ Magic Folder clients. it is not clear how to handle this at all: Magic Folder clients. this is the easiest option to implement. -Other design issues -''''''''''''''''''' +Summary +------- -* choice of conflicted filenames (e.g. ``foo.by_bob_at_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS[v].type``) +This completes the design of remote-to-local synchronization. +We realize that it may seem very complicated. Anecdotally, proprietory +synchronization designs we are aware of, such as Dropbox, are said +to incur similar or greater design complexity. -- 2.45.2