From 1578be2aa014727dd0184e859e2ef1eb4234019a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3rdd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:25:50 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] solution to 2.60

---
 src/sicp/ex2_60.clj | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/sicp/ex2_60.clj

diff --git a/src/sicp/ex2_60.clj b/src/sicp/ex2_60.clj
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c2e249
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/sicp/ex2_60.clj
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+(ns sicp.ex2_60)
+
+;;; a set for which duplicates are allowed
+
+(comment
+  "element-of-set? will be same program and union, intersection and
+   adjoin-set will differ. element-of-set? has to traverse a bigger
+   list in the worst case of element not in the set. But union is easy,
+   just concat the two sets. adjoin-set also does not require traversing
+   the set thru element-of-set?. Instead it is a simple cons of the new
+   element with the list representing the set."
+  "If the application involves"
+  )
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.45.2