From: Brian Warner <warner@lothar.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:15:06 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: test_repairer: change to use faster no_network.GridTestMixin, split Verifier tests... 
X-Git-Url: https://git.rkrishnan.org/frontends/CLI.txt?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7cfbb9c83292110e04bf5bc2191adb50bc891a4d;p=tahoe-lafs%2Ftahoe-lafs.git

test_repairer: change to use faster no_network.GridTestMixin, split Verifier tests into separate cases, refactor judgement funcs into shared methods
---

diff --git a/src/allmydata/test/no_network.py b/src/allmydata/test/no_network.py
index 633accba..79233d4f 100644
--- a/src/allmydata/test/no_network.py
+++ b/src/allmydata/test/no_network.py
@@ -276,3 +276,10 @@ class GridTestMixin:
         sharedata = open(sharefile, "rb").read()
         corruptdata = corruptor_function(sharedata)
         open(sharefile, "wb").write(corruptdata)
+
+    def corrupt_shares_numbered(self, uri, shnums, corruptor):
+        for (i_shnum, i_serverid, i_sharefile) in self.find_shares(uri):
+            if i_shnum in shnums:
+                sharedata = open(i_sharefile, "rb").read()
+                corruptdata = corruptor(sharedata)
+                open(i_sharefile, "wb").write(corruptdata)
diff --git a/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py b/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py
index 9ff7928e..e8b63e89 100644
--- a/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py
+++ b/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py
@@ -13,328 +13,288 @@ from no_network import GridTestMixin
 READ_LEEWAY = 18
 MAX_DELTA_READS = 10 * READ_LEEWAY # N = 10
 
-class Verifier(common.ShareManglingMixin, unittest.TestCase):
-    def test_check_without_verify(self):
-        """Check says the file is healthy when none of the shares have been
-        touched. It says that the file is unhealthy when all of them have
-        been removed. It doesn't use any reads.
-        """
-        d = defer.succeed(self.filenode)
-        def _check1(filenode):
-            before_check_reads = self._count_reads()
 
-            d2 = filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=False)
-            def _after_check(checkresults):
-                after_check_reads = self._count_reads()
-                self.failIf(after_check_reads - before_check_reads > 0, after_check_reads - before_check_reads)
-                self.failUnless(checkresults.is_healthy())
+class RepairTestMixin:
+    def failUnlessIsInstance(self, x, xtype):
+        self.failUnless(isinstance(x, xtype), x)
 
-            d2.addCallback(_after_check)
-            return d2
-        d.addCallback(_check1)
+    def _count_reads(self):
+        sum_of_read_counts = 0
+        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
+            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
+            sum_of_read_counts += counters.get('storage_server.read', 0)
+        return sum_of_read_counts
+
+    def _count_allocates(self):
+        sum_of_allocate_counts = 0
+        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
+            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
+            sum_of_allocate_counts += counters.get('storage_server.allocate', 0)
+        return sum_of_allocate_counts
 
-        d.addCallback(lambda ignore: self.replace_shares({}, storage_index=self.uri.storage_index))
-        def _check2(ignored):
-            before_check_reads = self._count_reads()
-            d2 = self.filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=False)
+    def _count_writes(self):
+        sum_of_write_counts = 0
+        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
+            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
+            sum_of_write_counts += counters.get('storage_server.write', 0)
+        return sum_of_write_counts
 
-            def _after_check(checkresults):
-                after_check_reads = self._count_reads()
-                self.failIf(after_check_reads - before_check_reads > 0, after_check_reads - before_check_reads)
-                self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy())
+    def _stash_counts(self):
+        self.before_repair_reads = self._count_reads()
+        self.before_repair_allocates = self._count_allocates()
+        self.before_repair_writes = self._count_writes()
 
-            d2.addCallback(_after_check)
-            return d2
-        d.addCallback(_check2)
+    def _get_delta_counts(self):
+        delta_reads = self._count_reads() - self.before_repair_reads
+        delta_allocates = self._count_allocates() - self.before_repair_allocates
+        delta_writes = self._count_writes() - self.before_repair_writes
+        return (delta_reads, delta_allocates, delta_writes)
 
+    def failIfBigger(self, x, y):
+        self.failIf(x > y, "%s > %s" % (x, y))
+
+    def upload_and_stash(self):
+        c0 = self.g.clients[0]
+        c1 = self.g.clients[1]
+        c0.DEFAULT_ENCODING_PARAMETERS['max_segment_size'] = 12
+        d = c0.upload(upload.Data(common.TEST_DATA, convergence=""))
+        def _stash_uri(ur):
+            self.uri = ur.uri
+            self.c0_filenode = c0.create_node_from_uri(ur.uri)
+            self.c1_filenode = c1.create_node_from_uri(ur.uri)
+        d.addCallback(_stash_uri)
         return d
 
-    def _help_test_verify(self, corruptor_funcs, judgement_func):
-        d = defer.succeed(None)
+class Verifier(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, RepairTestMixin):
+    def test_check_without_verify(self):
+        """Check says the file is healthy when none of the shares have been
+        touched. It says that the file is unhealthy when all of them have
+        been removed. It doesn't use any reads.
+        """
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verifier/check_without_verify"
+        self.set_up_grid(num_clients=2)
+        d = self.upload_and_stash()
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored: self._stash_counts())
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored:
+                      self.c0_filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=False))
+        def _check(cr):
+            self.failUnless(cr.is_healthy())
+            delta_reads, delta_allocates, delta_writes = self._get_delta_counts()
+            self.failIfBigger(delta_reads, 0)
+        d.addCallback(_check)
 
-        d.addCallback(self.find_shares)
-        stash = [None]
-        def _stash_it(res):
-            stash[0] = res
-            return res
-        d.addCallback(_stash_it)
-        def _put_it_all_back(ignored):
-            self.replace_shares(stash[0], storage_index=self.uri.storage_index)
-            return ignored
+        def _remove_all(ignored):
+            for sh in self.find_shares(self.uri):
+                self.delete_share(sh)
+        d.addCallback(_remove_all)
 
-        def _verify_after_corruption(shnum, corruptor_func):
-            before_check_reads = self._count_reads()
-            d2 = self.filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=True)
-            def _after_check(checkresults):
-                after_check_reads = self._count_reads()
-                self.failIf(after_check_reads - before_check_reads > MAX_DELTA_READS, (after_check_reads, before_check_reads))
-                try:
-                    return judgement_func(checkresults)
-                except Exception, le:
-                    le.args = tuple(le.args + ("corruptor_func: " + corruptor_func.__name__,))
-                    raise
-
-            d2.addCallback(_after_check)
-            return d2
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored: self._stash_counts())
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored:
+                      self.c0_filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=False))
+        def _check2(cr):
+            self.failIf(cr.is_healthy())
+            delta_reads, delta_allocates, delta_writes = self._get_delta_counts()
+            self.failIfBigger(delta_reads, 0)
+        d.addCallback(_check2)
+        return d
 
-        for corruptor_func in corruptor_funcs:
-            d.addCallback(self._corrupt_a_random_share, corruptor_func)
-            d.addCallback(_verify_after_corruption, corruptor_func)
-            d.addCallback(_put_it_all_back)
+    def _help_test_verify(self, corruptor, judgement, shnum=0):
+        self.set_up_grid(num_clients=2)
+        d = self.upload_and_stash()
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored: self._stash_counts())
 
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored:
+                      self.corrupt_shares_numbered(self.uri, [shnum],corruptor))
+        d.addCallback(lambda ignored:
+                      self.c1_filenode.check(Monitor(), verify=True))
+        def _check(vr):
+            delta_reads, delta_allocates, delta_writes = self._get_delta_counts()
+            self.failIfBigger(delta_reads, MAX_DELTA_READS)
+            try:
+                judgement(vr)
+            except unittest.FailTest, e:
+                # FailTest just uses e.args[0] == str
+                new_arg = str(e.args[0]) + "\nvr.data is: " + str(vr.get_data())
+                e.args = (new_arg,)
+                raise
+        d.addCallback(_check)
         return d
 
-    def test_verify_no_problem(self):
+    def judge_no_problem(self, vr):
         """ Verify says the file is healthy when none of the shares have been
         touched in a way that matters. It doesn't use more than seven times
         as many reads as it needs."""
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failUnless(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 0, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_nothing,
-            common._corrupt_size_of_file_data,
-            common._corrupt_size_of_sharedata,
-            common._corrupt_segment_size, ], judge)
-
-    def test_verify_server_visible_corruption(self):
+        self.failUnless(vr.is_healthy(), (vr, vr.is_healthy(), vr.get_data()))
+        data = vr.get_data()
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 0, data)
+
+    def test_verify_no_problem_1(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_no_problem_1"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_nothing,
+                                      self.judge_no_problem)
+
+    def test_verify_no_problem_2(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_no_problem_2"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_size_of_file_data,
+                                      self.judge_no_problem)
+
+    def test_verify_no_problem_3(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_no_problem_3"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_size_of_sharedata,
+                                      self.judge_no_problem)
+
+    def test_verify_no_problem_4(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_no_problem_4"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_segment_size,
+                                      self.judge_no_problem)
+
+    def judge_visible_corruption(self, vr):
         """Corruption which is detected by the server means that the server
         will send you back a Failure in response to get_bucket instead of
         giving you the share data. Test that verifier handles these answers
         correctly. It doesn't use more than seven times as many reads as it
         needs."""
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            # The server might fail to serve up its other share as well as
-            # the corrupted one, so count-shares-good could be 8 or 9.
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] in (8, 9), data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) in (8, 9,), data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            # The server may have served up the non-corrupted share, or it
-            # may not have, so the checker could have detected either 4 or 5
-            # good servers.
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] in (4, 5), data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) in (4, 5), data)
-            # If the server served up the other share, then the checker
-            # should consider it good, else it should not.
-            self.failUnless((data['count-shares-good'] == 9) == (data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5), data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 0, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_file_version_number,
-            ], judge)
-
-    def test_verify_share_incompatibility(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_sharedata_version_number,
-            ], judge)
-
-    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_sharedata,
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_uri_extension,
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_uri_extension_to_force_short_read,
-            common._corrupt_share_data,
-            common._corrupt_length_of_uri_extension,
-            common._corrupt_uri_extension,
-            ], judge)
+        self.failIf(vr.is_healthy(), (vr, vr.is_healthy(), vr.get_data()))
+        data = vr.get_data()
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 9, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 10, data)
+        self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 0, data)
+
+    def test_verify_server_visible_corruption(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_visible_corruption"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_file_version_number,
+                                      self.judge_visible_corruption)
+
+    def judge_share_version_incompatibility(self, vr):
+        # corruption of the share version (inside the container, the 1/2
+        # value that determines whether we've got 4-byte offsets or 8-byte
+        # offsets) to something larger than 2 will trigger a
+        # ShareVersionIncompatible exception, which should be counted in
+        # list-incompatible-shares, rather than list-corrupt-shares.
+        self.failIf(vr.is_healthy(), (vr, vr.is_healthy(), vr.get_data()))
+        data = vr.get_data()
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-good'], 9)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['sharemap']), 9)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-needed'], 3)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-expected'], 10)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-good-share-hosts'], 9)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['servers-responding']), 10)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']), 0)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-corrupt-shares'], 0)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']), 1)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-incompatible-shares'], 1)
+
+    def test_verify_share_version_incompatibility(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_share_version_incompatibility"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_sharedata_version_number,
+                                      self.judge_share_version_incompatibility)
+
+    def judge_invisible_corruption(self, vr):
+        # corruption of fields that the server does not check (which is most
+        # of them), which will be detected by the client as it downloads
+        # those shares.
+        self.failIf(vr.is_healthy(), (vr, vr.is_healthy(), vr.get_data()))
+        data = vr.get_data()
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-good'], 9)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-needed'], 3)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-shares-expected'], 10)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-good-share-hosts'], 9)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-corrupt-shares'], 1)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']), 1)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(data['count-incompatible-shares'], 0)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']), 0)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['servers-responding']), 10)
+        self.failUnlessEqual(len(data['sharemap']), 9)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_1(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_1"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_sharedata,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_2(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_2"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_uri_extension,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_3(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_3"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_uri_extension_to_force_short_read,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_4(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_4"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_share_data,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_5(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_5"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_length_of_uri_extension,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
+
+    def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_6(self):
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_6"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_uri_extension,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree_to_truncate_crypttext_hashtree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_block_hashes_to_truncate_crypttext_hashes,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree_to_truncate_crypttext_hashtree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_block_hashes_to_truncate_crypttext_hashes,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree_to_truncate_crypttext_hashtree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_block_hashes,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_block_hashes,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_block_hashtree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_sharedata_plausible_version(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_sharedata_version_number_to_plausible_version,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_sharedata_plausible_version"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_sharedata_version_number_to_plausible_version,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_share_hashtree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_share_hashes,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_share_hashtree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_share_hashes,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_share_hashtree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_ciphertext_hashtree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_offset_of_ciphertext_hash_tree,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_ciphertext_hashtree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_offset_of_ciphertext_hash_tree,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_offset_of_ciphertext_hashtree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_cryptext_hash_tree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_crypttext_hash_tree,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_cryptext_hash_tree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_crypttext_hash_tree,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_cryptext_hash_tree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_block_hash_tree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_block_hashes,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_block_hash_tree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_block_hashes,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_block_hash_tree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
     def test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_share_hash_tree_TODO(self):
-        def judge(checkresults):
-            self.failIf(checkresults.is_healthy(), (checkresults, checkresults.is_healthy(), checkresults.get_data()))
-            data = checkresults.get_data()
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-good'] == 9, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-needed'] == 3, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-shares-expected'] == 10, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-good-share-hosts'] == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(data['count-corrupt-shares'] == 1, (data,))
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == 1, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-corrupt-shares']) == data['count-corrupt-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == data['count-incompatible-shares'], data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['list-incompatible-shares']) == 0, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['servers-responding']) == 5, data)
-            self.failUnless(len(data['sharemap']) == 9, data)
-        return self._help_test_verify([
-            common._corrupt_share_hashes,
-            ], judge)
+        self.basedir = "repairer/Verify/verify_server_invisible_corruption_share_hash_tree"
+        return self._help_test_verify(common._corrupt_share_hashes,
+                                      self.judge_invisible_corruption)
     test_verify_server_invisible_corruption_share_hash_tree_TODO.todo = "Verifier doesn't yet properly detect this kind of corruption."
 
-# We'll allow you to pass this test even if you trigger thirty-five times as many block sends
-# and disk writes as would be optimal.
+# We'll allow you to pass this test even if you trigger thirty-five times as
+# many block sends and disk writes as would be optimal.
 WRITE_LEEWAY = 35
 # Optimally, you could repair one of these (small) files in a single write.
 DELTA_WRITES_PER_SHARE = 1 * WRITE_LEEWAY
@@ -432,21 +392,10 @@ class DownUpConnector(unittest.TestCase):
         d.addCallback(_callb)
         return d
 
-class Repairer(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, common.ShouldFailMixin):
+class Repairer(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, RepairTestMixin,
+               common.ShouldFailMixin):
 
-    def upload_and_stash(self):
-        c0 = self.g.clients[0]
-        c1 = self.g.clients[1]
-        c0.DEFAULT_ENCODING_PARAMETERS['max_segment_size'] = 12
-        d = c0.upload(upload.Data(common.TEST_DATA, convergence=""))
-        def _stash_uri(ur):
-            self.uri = ur.uri
-            self.c0_filenode = c0.create_node_from_uri(ur.uri)
-            self.c1_filenode = c1.create_node_from_uri(ur.uri)
-        d.addCallback(_stash_uri)
-        return d
-
-    def test_test_code(self):
+    def test_harness(self):
         # This test is actually to make sure our test harness works, rather
         # than testing anything about Tahoe code itself.
 
@@ -477,12 +426,11 @@ class Repairer(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, common.ShouldFailMixin):
                                       None,
                                       self.c1_filenode.download_to_data))
 
-        repair_monitor = Monitor()
         d.addCallback(lambda ignored:
                       self.shouldFail(NotEnoughSharesError, "then_repair",
                                       None,
                                       self.c1_filenode.check_and_repair,
-                                      repair_monitor, verify=False))
+                                      Monitor(), verify=False))
 
         # test share corruption
         def _test_corrupt(ignored):
@@ -497,7 +445,7 @@ class Repairer(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, common.ShouldFailMixin):
                 self.failIfEqual(olddata[ (shnum, serverid) ], newdata)
         d.addCallback(_test_corrupt)
 
-        def _remove_all(shares):
+        def _remove_all(ignored):
             for sh in self.find_shares(self.uri):
                 self.delete_share(sh)
         d.addCallback(_remove_all)
@@ -506,44 +454,6 @@ class Repairer(GridTestMixin, unittest.TestCase, common.ShouldFailMixin):
 
         return d
 
-    def failUnlessIsInstance(self, x, xtype):
-        self.failUnless(isinstance(x, xtype), x)
-
-    def _count_reads(self):
-        sum_of_read_counts = 0
-        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
-            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
-            sum_of_read_counts += counters.get('storage_server.read', 0)
-        return sum_of_read_counts
-
-    def _count_allocates(self):
-        sum_of_allocate_counts = 0
-        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
-            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
-            sum_of_allocate_counts += counters.get('storage_server.allocate', 0)
-        return sum_of_allocate_counts
-
-    def _count_writes(self):
-        sum_of_write_counts = 0
-        for (i, ss, storedir) in self.iterate_servers():
-            counters = ss.stats_provider.get_stats()['counters']
-            sum_of_write_counts += counters.get('storage_server.write', 0)
-        return sum_of_write_counts
-
-    def _stash_counts(self):
-        self.before_repair_reads = self._count_reads()
-        self.before_repair_allocates = self._count_allocates()
-        self.before_repair_writes = self._count_writes()
-
-    def _get_delta_counts(self):
-        delta_reads = self._count_reads() - self.before_repair_reads
-        delta_allocates = self._count_allocates() - self.before_repair_allocates
-        delta_writes = self._count_writes() - self.before_repair_writes
-        return (delta_reads, delta_allocates, delta_writes)
-
-    def failIfBigger(self, x, y):
-        self.failIf(x > y, "%s > %s" % (x, y))
-
     def test_repair_from_deletion_of_1(self):
         """ Repair replaces a share that got deleted. """
         self.basedir = "repairer/Repairer/repair_from_deletion_of_1"