From: Brian Warner Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:01:59 +0000 (-0700) Subject: test_repairer: disable repair-from-corruption tests until other things are improved... X-Git-Tag: allmydata-tahoe-1.3.0~33 X-Git-Url: https://git.rkrishnan.org/simplejson/-?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5f288842d599a7f11cc0f3a7b9c1944c9b2035b2;p=tahoe-lafs%2Ftahoe-lafs.git test_repairer: disable repair-from-corruption tests until other things are improved well enough to make it useful --- diff --git a/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py b/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py index d15f2eae..814e97d7 100644 --- a/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py +++ b/src/allmydata/test/test_repairer.py @@ -547,7 +547,41 @@ class Repairer(common.ShareManglingMixin, unittest.TestCase): d.addCallback(_repair_from_deletion_of_7) return d - def test_repair_from_corruption_of_1(self): + # why is test_repair_from_corruption_of_1 disabled? Read on: + # + # As recently documented in NEWS for the 1.3.0 release, the current + # immutable repairer suffers from several limitations: + # + # * minimalistic verifier: it's just download without decryption, so we + # don't look for corruption in N-k shares, and for many fields (those + # which are the same in all shares) we only look for corruption in a + # single share + # + # * some kinds of corruption cause download to fail (when it ought to + # just switch to a different share), so repair will fail on these too + # + # * RIStorageServer doesn't offer a way to delete old corrupt immutable + # shares (the authority model is not at all clear), so the best the + # repairer can do is to put replacement shares on new servers, + # unfortunately leaving the corrupt shares in place + # + # This test is pretty strenuous: it asserts that the repairer does the + # ideal thing in 8 distinct situations, with randomized corruption in + # each. Because of the aforementioned limitations, it is highly unlikely + # to pass any of these. We're also concerned that the download-fails case + # can provoke a lost-progress bug (one was fixed, but there might be more + # lurking), which will cause the test to fail despite a ".todo" marker, + # and will probably cause subsequent unrelated tests to fail too (due to + # "unclean reactor" problems). + # + # So we're turning this test off until we've done one or more of the + # following: + # * remove some of these limitations + # * break the test up into smaller, more functionally-oriented pieces + # * simplify the repairer enough to let us be confident that it is free + # of lost-progress bugs + + def OFF_test_repair_from_corruption_of_1(self): d = defer.succeed(None) d.addCallback(self.find_shares) @@ -628,7 +662,7 @@ class Repairer(common.ShareManglingMixin, unittest.TestCase): d.addCallback(_repair_from_corruption, corruptor_func) return d - test_repair_from_corruption_of_1.todo = "Repairer doesn't properly replace corrupted shares yet." + #test_repair_from_corruption_of_1.todo = "Repairer doesn't properly replace corrupted shares yet." # XXX extend these tests to show that the checker detects which specific