From: Brian Warner Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:43:52 +0000 (-0700) Subject: NEWS: explain limitations of the new repairer X-Git-Tag: allmydata-tahoe-1.3.0~34 X-Git-Url: https://git.rkrishnan.org/specifications/components/com_hotproperty/about.html?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e0abc7840801ae04dca98b7d2405a0eeaa26b9af;p=tahoe-lafs%2Ftahoe-lafs.git NEWS: explain limitations of the new repairer --- diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 583373bf..692fdebf 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -14,17 +14,38 @@ asserting that the server's share is undamaged: it requires more work checking cannot. "Repair" is the act of replacing missing or damaged shares with new ones. -For mutable files (and therefore directories), missing shares can be -regenerated, and corrupted shares can be repaired in place. For immutable -files, missing shares are regenerated, and corrupted shares are handled by -uploading new shares to other servers. The storage server protocol does not -allow clients to change or remove immutable shares, so if persistent -corruption is detected, the user and the storage server operator must work -together to remove the damaged share. Note that corrupted shares indicate -hardware failures, serious software bugs, or malice on the part of the -storage server operator, so a corrupted share should be considered highly -unusual. The "incident gatherer" mechanism will automatically report share -corruption to an incident gatherer service, if one is configured. +This release includes a full checker, a partial verifier, and a partial +repairer. The repairer is able to handle missing shares: new shares are +generated and uploaded to make up for the missing ones. This is currently the +best application of the repairer: to replace shares that were lost because of +server departure or permanent drive failure. + +The repairer in this release is somewhat able to handle corrupted shares. The +limitations are: + + * Immutable verifier is incomplete: not all shares are used, and not all + fields of those shares are verified. Therefore the immutable verifier has + only a moderate chance of detecting corrupted shares. + * The mutable verifier is mostly complete: all shares are examined, and most + fields of the shares are validated. + * The storage server protocol offers no way for the repairer to replace or + delete immutable shares. If corruption is detected, the repairer will + upload replacement shares to other servers, but the corrupted shares will + be left in place. + * Some forms of corruption can cause both download and repair operations to + fail. A future release will fix this, since download should be tolerant of + any corruption as long as there are at least 'k' valid shares, and repair + should be able to fix any file that is downloadable. + +If the downloader, verifier, or repairer detects share corruption, the +servers which provided the bad shares will be notified (via a file placed in +the BASEDIR/storage/corruption-advisories directory) so their operators can +manually delete the corrupted shares and investigate the problem. In +addition, the "incident gatherer" mechanism will automatically report share +corruption to an incident gatherer service, if one is configured. Note that +corrupted shares indicate hardware failures, serious software bugs, or malice +on the part of the storage server operator, so a corrupted share should be +considered highly unusual. By periodically checking/repairing all files and directories, objects in the Tahoe filesystem remain resistant to recoverability failures due to missing